November 2015

Table of Contents - PeerJ Preprints

November 11, 2015 - Version: 2
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1311v2
November 26, 2015 - Version: 1
, , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1537v1
November 14, 2015 - Version: 2
, , , , , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1030v2
November 11, 2015 - Version: 1
,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1495v1
November 30, 2015 - Version: 1
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1543v1
November 5, 2015 - Version: 3
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1165v3
November 11, 2015 - Version: 1
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1497v1
November 12, 2015 - Version: 1
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1502v1
November 19, 2015 - Version: 1
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1519v1
November 24, 2015 - Version: 1
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1528v1
November 17, 2015 - Version: 1
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1509v1
November 30, 2015 - Version: 2
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1196v2
November 14, 2015 - Version: 1
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1507v1
November 7, 2015 - Version: 1
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1480v1
November 24, 2015 - Version: 1
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1523v1
November 17, 2015 - Version: 1
,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1511v1
November 30, 2015 - Version: 1
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1549v1
November 3, 2015 - Version: 1
,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1473v1
November 11, 2015 - Version: 1
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1490v1
November 3, 2015 - Version: 1
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1474v1
November 9, 2015 - Version: 1
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1483v1
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback