Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Code supplement

This supplement includes all code and data required to replicate our analysis. The analysis.R file will read in the data from the stan_d.rds file, compile the Stan model (mod.stan), then estimate the parameters and recreate the figures.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1502v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Maxwell B Joseph conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

William E Stutz conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Pieter TJ Johnson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

University of Colorado IACUC Protocol 1302.02: "Ecological drivers of amphibian disease: experimental studies"

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any raw data.

Funding

This research was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health, Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases Program (R01GM109499), the National Science Foundation (DEB-1149308), and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies