July 2016

Table of Contents - PeerJ (Biology Articles)

July 7, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2070 PubMed 27441105
July 19, 2016
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2187 PubMed 27547523
July 19, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2156 PubMed 27547519
July 19, 2016
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2245 PubMed 27547552
July 7, 2016
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1916 PubMed 27441102
July 27, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2236 PubMed 27547545
July 28, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2263 PubMed 27547568
July 19, 2016
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2128 PubMed 27547517
July 26, 2016
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2269 PubMed 27547572
July 6, 2016
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2189 PubMed 27441122
July 7, 2016
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2177 PubMed 27441118
July 6, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2181 PubMed 27441119
July 6, 2016
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2073 PubMed 27441106
July 28, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2295 PubMed 27547586
July 26, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2196 PubMed 27547525
July 19, 2016
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2231 PubMed 27547541
July 14, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2213 PubMed 27478704
July 14, 2016
, , , , , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2221 PubMed 27478708
July 12, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2199 PubMed 27478701
July 14, 2016
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2203 PubMed 27478702
July 26, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2250 PubMed 27547556
July 7, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2147 PubMed 27441113
July 14, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2230 PubMed 27478713
July 20, 2016
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2238 PubMed 27547546
July 28, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2298 PubMed 27547587

Archives - Biology

I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback