A short-term energy consumption forecasting model for charging stations based on an enhanced DBO-optimized hybrid CNN-transformer architecture


Abstract

Accurate energy consumption prediction is crucial for the operational stability of smart grids and the integration of sustainable energy. To address the limitations of existing models in capturing the complex temporal dynamics of charging station loads, this paper proposes a novel hybrid model — Combined-DBO-Transformer. We first confirm that the Transformer architecture inherently outperforms traditional LSTM and GRU models in modeling long-term dependencies and complex temporal patterns. To fully unleash the potential of the Transformer, we introduce a significantly enhanced Dung Beetle Optimizer (DBO), which strategically integrates three advanced mechanisms: a Chebyshev chaotic map for enriching population diversity, a Golden Sine Algorithm for improving local search capability, and an adaptive t-distribution mutation for dynamically balancing exploration and exploitation. Extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance, with MAE, RMSE, and MAPE as low as 0.0491, 0.0628, and 6.74%, respectively, significantly outperforming other optimizer-enhanced Transformer variants (e.g., BO, PSO, SSA). Ablation studies further indicate that the adaptive t-distribution mutation is the core driver of performance improvement, and the synergistic combination of all components is essential for achieving superior prediction accuracy, accelerated convergence, and enhanced robustness. This framework not only provides a powerful tool for energy prediction but also offers a paradigm blueprint for developing hybrid optimization-deep learning models for complex time series tasks.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].