Practice of reinforcement learning-based traffic flow optimization strategies for intelligent traffic management system applications


Abstract

As urbanization and industrialization escalate, the burgeoning traffic flow precipitates grave issues of congestion, environmental degradation, and heightened energy consumption, thereby imperiling the sustainable evolution of urban centers and the life quality of their denizens. The inception of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) is designed to enhance the operational efficiency and efficacy of traffic management via the deployment of sophisticated information technology, data analytics, and machine learning methodologies. In this treatise, we introduce a pioneering deep learning architecture, denoted as RL-LGCN, for the short-term forecasting of traffic flow, integrating Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN), Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), and Reinforcement Learning (RL). Initially, we undertake the preprocessing of traffic data, encompassing data purification and the imputation of missing values, followed by the extraction of periodic attributes using the trigonometric encoding technique to ready the data for model input. Subsequently, the spatial interdependencies within the traffic network are delineated by GCN, while the extensive temporal dependencies of the time-series data are managed by GRU. Building on this foundation, the model undergoes continuous training and refinement by perpetually updating the interplay between the model and the external milieu through reinforcement learning. Our empirical evaluations reveal that the predictive accuracy of the RL-LGCN framework is markedly superior on both public and proprietary datasets, outstripping the performance of conventional monolithic models. This research furnishes robust technical backing for intelligent traffic management systems, propels the advancement of traffic flow prediction techniques, and establishes a cornerstone for the future's intelligent and automated urban transportation infrastructures.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].