Back to all available

Erosion of Amazonian mangroves over peatlands leads to soil carbon loss

environmental-sciences
climate-change-biology
natural-resource-management
biogeochemistry
forestry

Abstract

Background. Mangrove forests are coastal ecosystems with high soil carbon stocks as a result of intense forest productivity and saturated soils that favor organic preservation for long periods of time. In some regions, the overlap of mangroves with peatlands revealed large soil carbon stocks with great conservation interest. Coastal erosion significantly threatens mangrove forests globally, yet carbon emissions from such losses, especially over peatlands, remain underexplored. Although peatlands are abundant in South America, their overlap with mangroves along the Brazilian Amazon coast has never been fully explored.

Methods. We explored mangroves in the Amazon coast of Brazil that were predicted to occur over coastal peatlands, and estimated their soil carbon stocks. We then overlapped the peatland and mangrove distribution on the Amazon coast to quantify their extent, estimated the potential emission factors associated with erosion and loss of their soil carbon stocks.

Results. We discovered shallow organic peat layers beneath Brazilian Amazon mangroves and estimated that mangroves over peatlands cover approximately 3,667 km², nearly 30% of Brazil’s mangroves. Here, we conducted soil sampling and carbon stock analyses on Maracá Island, revealing peat layers 51–71 cm thick with high carbon content. Emission factors from eroded mangrove peatlands were estimated at 368 Mg CO 2 -eq ha⁻¹, representing 72% of soil carbon stocks. These findings highlight the substantial carbon reservoir in Amazonian mangrove peatlands and their vulnerability to erosion-driven carbon release. Recognizing mangroves over peatlands as distinct ecosystems is crucial for accurate carbon accounting and informs conservation strategies aimed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from coastal erosion in the Amazon.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.
  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].