VistoGen: A compact multi-task vision-language model for unified histopathology report generation, survival prediction, and tumor grading


Abstract

Deep learning has significantly advanced histopathology image analysis, aiding in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and precision medicine, particularly through the emergence of Vision-Language Models (VLMs). However, the inherent complexity of analyzing pathological images, coupled with the need for domain-specific expertise and the computational demands of large, fragmented models, presents a significant challenge for automating tasks like report generation, tumor grading, and patient survival prediction. This study proposes VistoGen, a novel multi-task VLM designed to explicitly overcome these limitations. To address high computational demands, VistoGen is a compact and lightweight (256M parameters) dual-encoder framework. It tackles the inherent complexity of pathological images using a shape-optimized vision encoder pre-trained on a substantial corpus of histopathology images. To embed domain-specific expertise, the key component is our two-stage adaptation strategy: first, fine-tuning on whole-slide image (WSI)-caption pairs to learn domain-specific visual-linguistic mappings, and second, applying robust multi-task optimization with specialized heads for report generation, survival prediction, and tumor grading. Our methodology is extensively evaluated on WSI patch datasets, including PatchGastricADC22 for report generation, and TCGA-GBMLGG and TCGA-KIRC for cancer grade classification and patient survival prediction. Experimental results demonstrate that VistoGen achieves state-of-the-art performance across all tasks. It surpasses previous methodologies with a C-Index of 0.782 for survival analysis on TCGA-KIRC and a notable C-Index of 0.8322 for survival analysis on TCGA-GBMLGG. Furthermore, for histopathology captioning, VistoGen establishes a new state-of-the-art with a ROUGE-L score of 0.665 on the PatchGastricADC22 dataset.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].