Visitors   Views   Downloads
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

A thesaurus of the words contributing to each habitat category

A list of all the words and phrases contributing to each habitat category in the analysis of the Chenopodium vulvaria corpus of habitat descriptions.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.536v1/supp-1

Datasets used from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility and the Atlas of Living Australia

A list of the datasets and a link to their metadata supplied by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility accessed 08 Nov 2013 and the Atlas of Living Australia accessed 25 February 2013 containing observations of Chenopodium vulvaria.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.536v1/supp-2

Citations to the sources of observations and habitat descriptions used in the paper

The references to the sources of observations and habitat descriptions of Chenopodium vulvaria.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.536v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Quentin J Groom is an employee of Botanic Garden Meise, a volunteer with the Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland. He is on the Editorial Board of the New Journal of Botany and a Subject Editor for the Biodiversity Data Journal.

Author Contributions

Quentin J Groom conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:


This work has been supported by the pro-iBiosphere project funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme, grant agreement number 312848. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies