Self-concept in poor readers: a systematic review protocol
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Cognitive Disorders, Psychiatry and Psychology
- Keywords
- dyslexia, self-concept, reading, systematic review, protocol, self-esteem
- Copyright
- © 2016 McArthur et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2016. Self-concept in poor readers: a systematic review protocol. PeerJ Preprints 4:e2062v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2062v1
Abstract
Individuals with poor reading ability are at greater risk of educational and occupational difficulties. In addition to this, these individuals are also at greater risk of poor health outcomes, particularly mental health. At least some of this association may be underpinned by poor self-concept; however, the evidence for this relationship is mixed. In this systematic review protocol, we outline an approach to adjudicate between three reasons for these mixed results: (1) poor reading is more closely associated with some types of self-concept than others; (2) low self-concept is more closely associated with some types of poor reading than others; and (3) low self-concept is not associated with poor reading per se, but is associated with co-morbid problems with language or attention. The protocol proposes a review (based on PRSIMA-P guidelines) to use the existing literature to explore the evidence for these possibilities to better understand the association between poor reading and low self-concept.
Author Comment
This is the first step in the development of a systematic review protocol to examine the existing literature on self-concept in poor readers. We consider this a working document, in that some of the details will be refined in order to adjust the protocol in relation to the available data as appropriate and as is common with systematic review protocol development.