Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

S1: Spring survey

Full spring survey questionnaire filled out by beekeepers in our study.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.795v1/supp-1

S2: Fall survey

Full fall survey questionnaire filled out by beekeepers in our study.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.795v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Douglas B Sponsler conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Reed M Johnson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

1. The Ohio State University Office of Responsible Research Practices

2. Approval numbers: Protocol # 2012E0136 (2012 year of study), Protocol # 2013E0012

Funding

This study was funded by the Ohio State Beekeepers' Association. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies