Visitors   Views   Downloads

Open access levels: a quantitative exploration using Web of Science and oaDOI data

View preprint
@DanielOberski @BasHofstra @thijs_bol @katyaoivanova @RobAckland @Open_access @oatp Publicatie-, citatie- en OA-data (althans voor tijdschriftartikelen) zijn bv. te verkrijgen uit citatiedatabases i.c.m. @unpaywall_data, zie voor NL uni's bv. https://t.co/tICT3l7KgZ en voor meer achtergrond en caveats https://t.co/8lMLNBzC5M
RT @MsPhelps: @CameronNeylon Figures from https://t.co/7tFjGRCMpx btw (so somewhat higher now due to improved green OA coverage) cc @jeroen…
@CameronNeylon Figures from https://t.co/7tFjGRCMpx btw (so somewhat higher now due to improved green OA coverage) cc @jeroenbosman
65 days ago
@INArxiv_ID Check out pages 11-13 here: https://t.co/dFLVcjEKo2
@HLdeJonge @Stan_Gielen @NWONieuws See for instance open access levels for various topics (data December 2017, from https://t.co/7tFjGRCMpx) cc @jeroenbosman https://t.co/VMuP4aWETo
RT @ryregier: Evergreen reminder that only about 20% of library science journal articles are OA and only 30% of our journals are Gold OA. U…
RT @ryregier: Evergreen reminder that only about 20% of library science journal articles are OA and only 30% of our journals are Gold OA. U…
RT @ryregier: Evergreen reminder that only about 20% of library science journal articles are OA and only 30% of our journals are Gold OA. U…
RT @ryregier: Evergreen reminder that only about 20% of library science journal articles are OA and only 30% of our journals are Gold OA. U…
RT @ryregier: Evergreen reminder that only about 20% of library science journal articles are OA and only 30% of our journals are Gold OA. U…
RT @ryregier: Evergreen reminder that only about 20% of library science journal articles are OA and only 30% of our journals are Gold OA. U…
RT @ryregier: Evergreen reminder that only about 20% of library science journal articles are OA and only 30% of our journals are Gold OA. U…
RT @ryregier: Evergreen reminder that only about 20% of library science journal articles are OA and only 30% of our journals are Gold OA. U…
136 days ago
Evergreen reminder that only about 20% of library science journal articles are OA and only 30% of our journals are Gold OA. Use @LISSArchive ! https://t.co/dFLVcjEKo2 https://t.co/C3dWfbUnJD
@albertomartin @OBi_Ojemany In our study (https://t.co/7tFjGRCMpx, based on @Unpaywall_data and @webofscience ), a number of African countries (eg Tanzania) had high levels of OA, even with limited data on green OA. Will be interesting to see if this bears out in the GS data, as well #todolist https://t.co/96ZHuT10db
RT @MsPhelps: Open acccess levels: a quantitative exploration using @webofscience and @oaDOI_org data - our @PeerJPreprints preprint is out…
170 days ago
RT @MsPhelps: Open acccess levels: a quantitative exploration using @webofscience and @oaDOI_org data - our @PeerJPreprints preprint is out…
173 days ago
Open access explored with WoS & oaDOI https://t.co/CRydmGedY7 via @PeerJPreprints
RT @MsPhelps: Very interesting to compare to our data retrieved using @unpaywall_data in @webofscience (https://t.co/7tFjGRCMpx) esp. for g…
180 days ago
RT @jeroenbosman: @ignasi Now that's what I call a realistic goal ;-) See also figure 5c in our preprint on open access levels: https://t.c…
@ignasi Now that's what I call a realistic goal ;-) See also figure 5c in our preprint on open access levels: https://t.co/Tv9ABrSJ8s
181 days ago
@erikasmith Ok, compared to other social science disciplines, but nowhere near the hard sciences. https://t.co/dFLVcjn8Zs https://t.co/OWiBx34lqy
184 days ago
RT @bijan_ranjbar: A thorough analysis of #openaccess by exploring #WoS and #oaDOI, thanks to @jeroenbosman and @MsPhelps. https://t.co/B…
189 days ago
RT @MsPhelps: Very interesting to compare to our data retrieved using @unpaywall_data in @webofscience (https://t.co/7tFjGRCMpx) esp. for g…
RT @MsPhelps: Very interesting to compare to our data retrieved using @unpaywall_data in @webofscience (https://t.co/7tFjGRCMpx) esp. for g…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Jeroen Bosman and Bianca Kramer are both affiliated to Utrecht University Library which supports and promotes open access and runs its own repository. They also run the project 101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication and as such, are also involved in the execution of the National Plan Open Science of the Netherlands.

Author Contributions

Jeroen Bosman conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Bianca Kramer conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Zenodo: scripts at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1137861 and data at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1143707

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies