Visitors   Views   Downloads

Neural canal ridges: A novel osteological correlate of post-cranial neurology in dinosaurs

View preprint
RT @bird_papers: peerJ: Neural canal ridges: A novel osteological correlate of post-cranial neurology in dinosaurs https://t.co/pdvuoxYhlH
33 days ago
New preprint: Neural canal ridges: A novel osteological correlate of post-cranial neurology in dinosaurs https://t.co/moebT6iyjK HT @PeerJPreprints
Neural canal ridges: A novel osteological correlate of post-cranial neurology in dinosaurs https://t.co/U9wGN4us3m
33 days ago
Neural canal ridges: A novel osteological correlate of post-cranial neurology in dinosaurs https://t.co/pFXeaUnuLc https://t.co/PQzNk5ksbJ
peerJ: Neural canal ridges: A novel osteological correlate of post-cranial neurology in dinosaurs https://t.co/pdvuoxYhlH
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Atterholt & Wedel SVPCA 2019 Slideshow

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27967v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Jessie Atterholt is a PeerJ Ambassador. Mathew J. Wedel is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Jessie Atterholt performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Mathew J Wedel conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article has not yet generated any raw data.

Funding

Mathew J. Wedel received funding from the Canyonlands Natural History Association for this project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies