NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Summary of trapping success during each trapping session for white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in Thousand Islands National Park, Canada

Numbers apply to the following for each trapping session: Tn – total trap nights, Trip – total disturbed traps, Ind – individually tagged white-footed mice caught, and Capt – total white-footed mice captures.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27830v1/supp-1

Data for the manuscript: No island-effect on stress for a rodent from a near-shore archipelago

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27830v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Nathan D Stewart conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Gabriela F Mastromonaco analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Gary Burness conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The Trent University Animal Care Committee, in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC), provided full approval for this research

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Field experiments in the Thousand Islands National Park were approved by Parks Canada (Permit No. 22959)

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw data are available for review at the following link:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/106RorMkWVAY--z7d3b1UPxOr-A8r700G/view?usp=sharing

Funding

This work was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada (No.RGPIN-04158-2014), and the Toronto Zoo. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads