How do campsites, forest fires, and entry point distance affect earthworm abundance in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness?
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Author and article information
Abstract
Factors controlling the spread of invasive earthworms in Minnesota’s Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness are poorly known. Believed to have been introduced by anglers who use them as bait, invasive earthworms can alter the physical and chemical properties of soil and modify forest plant communities. To examine factors influencing earthworm distribution and abundance, we sampled 38 islands across five lakes to assess the effects of campsites, fire, and entry point distance on earthworm density, biomass and species richness. We hypothesized that all three parameters would be greater on islands with campsites, lower on burned islands, and would decrease with distance from the wilderness entry point. In addition to sampling earthworms, we collected soil cores to examine soil organic matter and recorded ground and vegetation cover. Campsite presence was the single most important factor affecting sampled earthworm communities; density, biomass and species richness were all higher on islands having campsites. Fire was associated with reduced earthworm density, but had no direct effects on earthworm biomass or species richness. Fire influenced earthworm biomass primarily through its negative relationship to groundcover and through an interaction with entry point distance. Distance affected density but no other factor. For islands with campsites, however, distance from the entry point had a counterintuitive effect in that earthworm biomass, which increased with entry point distance.
Cite this as
2019. How do campsites, forest fires, and entry point distance affect earthworm abundance in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness? PeerJ Preprints 7:e27607v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27607v1note This preprint is not peer-reviewed. You may wish to reference the subsequent peer-reviewed version of this article.
Author comment
This is a submission to PeerJ for review.
Sections
Supplemental Information
Earthworm data collected from BWCA islands, 2016
Physical characteristics include island latitude & longitude, island area (m2), distance from entry point (m), island distance from lake shore, and whether island was burned and had campsites, island distance from lake shore (m). Also included are measured variables: earthworm density (#s/m2) and biomass (g/m2) and species richness; and data from sample sites: ground cover (%) understory vegetation cover (%) and soil organic matter (%).
Additional Information
Competing Interests
Todd Wellnitz has been a reviewer for PeerJ. The other authors have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Todd A Wellnitz conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, literature review and final draft.
Jenna L Barlow conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Cory M Dick conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Terrance R Shaurette conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Brian M Johnson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments.
Troy K Wesley conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables.
Data Deposition
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
1) The Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity (KNB)
2) urn:uuid:ded738fa-e662-488c-8d34-f4e8660c8912.
3) https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/view/urn:uuid:ded738fa-e662-488c-8d34-f4e8660c8912
Funding
This project was supported by BluGold Commitment funding provided by the University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire’s Office of Research and Sponsored Programs. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
