Visitors   Views   Downloads

Testing the hypothesis that routine sea ice coverage of 3-5 mkm2 results in a greater than 30% decline in population size of polar bears (Ursus maritimus)

View preprint
@theresphysics @TinusPulles https://t.co/IQhOtw8AYa This is her main paper in the discussion and I think it is a valid contribution to the discussion although it is not officially peer reviewed. It's not even mentioned by Harvey et al
73 days ago
@SilycatAlexiel @franceinfo https://t.co/6RF8QkkYa4
110 days ago
RT @plazaeme: @GonzaloSyldavia @HaddockAdhoc Nada interesante. Porque dijeron que a este nivel de hielo de ahora la población de osos dismi…
110 days ago
@GonzaloSyldavia @HaddockAdhoc Nada interesante. Porque dijeron que a este nivel de hielo de ahora la población de osos disminuiría entre un 30 - 67%, ¡y ha aumentado un 16%! https://t.co/jZ72dWN7Db
@AEDerocher Re: "Maybe submit it as a comment" She claims to have submitted comment papers, but I don't see how they support her blog contentions: https://t.co/ubZsmhfzjI Her recent, main supporting article is not peer-reviewed: https://t.co/WfVVCyc0Ep Bad signs.
133 days ago
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
133 days ago
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
133 days ago
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
137 days ago
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
137 days ago
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
137 days ago
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
137 days ago
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
137 days ago
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
137 days ago
RT @sjc_pbs: My #polarbear #seaice paper that consensus experts don't want people to read was one of the top 5 most viewed #ClimateChangeBi…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author has no competing interests to declare.

Author Contributions

Susan J Crockford conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate, collect, or analyse any raw data or code.

Funding

The author received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies