Visitors   Views   Downloads

flowDiv: a new pipeline for analyzing flow cytometric diversity

View preprint
RT @Xenpaper: flowDiv: a new pipeline for analyzing flow cytometric diversity https://t.co/KIfJVo0ScK
9 days ago
flowDiv: a new pipeline for analyzing flow cytometric diversity https://t.co/KIfJVo0ScK
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Bruno M Wanderley conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Daniel SA Araújo authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

María V Quiroga conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

André M Amado authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Adrião DD Neto authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Hugo Sarmento contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Sebastián D Metz contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Fernando Unrein conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

flowDiv is available on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/flowDiv/) and its source code can be found on GitHub (https://github.com/bmsw/flowDiv)

Funding

This work was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) within processes 2014/14139-3 and 2016/50494-8. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies