NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Collinearity Analysis between Chinese Cabbage and Arabidopsis thaliana

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26629v1/supp-1

Primer sequences for qRT-PCR

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26629v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jiangtao Du conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jie Ren conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables.

Xueling Ye conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Ailin Hou performed the experiments.

Wei Fu performed the experiments.

Fabo Mei performed the experiments.

Zhiyong Liu conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

We obtained genome sequences of B. rapa from the Brassica database BRAD, http://brassicadb.org/brad/

Funding

This work was supported by the National key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0101701) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772298 and 31201625) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
4 Citations   Views   Downloads