PeerJ Author & Reviewer
880 Points
Contributions by role
Contributions by subject area
Matthew MacManes
PeerJ Author & Reviewer
Past or current institution affiliations
PeerJ Contributions
August 3, 2018
October 27, 2016
June 14, 2016
May 2, 2016
October 28, 2014
January 21, 2016 - Version: 1
April 23, 2013 - Version: 1
Provided feedback on
20 Mar 2014
Chris et. al., I would consider deemphasizing (e.g. eliminating) N50 as a way to evaluate assembly quality. There is plenty of evidence that maximizing N50 may lead us astray, give...
05 Nov 2014
Transcriptome analyses of Anguillicola crassus from native and novel hosts
If I were reviewing (or reading) this manuscript, I'd want to know some more details about how you did your assembly (flags used in Trinity for instance). Also, were raw reads real...