Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Taruna Aggarwal conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Anthony Westbrook analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kirk Broders conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper, conceived funding.

Keith Woeste conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper, conceived funding.

Matthew D MacManes conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The pep files for F. solani (v2.0.29) and G. clavigera (kw1407.GCA_000143105.2.30) were downloaded from FungalEnsembl.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw reads are available at https://goo.gl/IMsMe5.

The code is available at https://github.com/macmanes-lab/Geosmithia_manuscript.

Funding

Partial funding was provided by the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station. This is Scientific Contribution Number 2652. Funding was also provided by the USDA Forest Service, Forest Health and Protection. Mention of a trademark, proprietary product, or vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products or vendors that also may be suitable. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies