Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Audio example 1: Primary Forest at SLR

Audio excerpt as shown in Figure 1 (top spectrogram)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1407v3/supp-1

Audio example 1: Secondary Forest at SLR

Audio excerpt as shown in Figure 1 (middle spectrogram)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1407v3/supp-2

Audio example 1: Silvopasture at SLR

Audio excerpt as shown in Figure 1 (bottom spectrogram)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1407v3/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Alice C Eldridge conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper, field work (data collection).

Michael Casey conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Paola Moscoso conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper, field work (data collection).

Mika Peck conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper, field work (data collection).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Audio files attached

Funding

Data collection was funded by a University of Sussex Research Development Fund grant; Analysis was funded by a Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies