The relationship between individual phenotype and the division of labour in naked mole-rats: it’s complicated

View article
Zoological Science

Main article text

 

Introduction

Materials & Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Supplemental Information

Individual Subject Data

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9891/supp-2

Code used to analyse the data in R Studio

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9891/supp-3

Code used to prepare the data for analysis in R Studio

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9891/supp-4

Full Model Output

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9891/supp-5

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

James D. Gilbert conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Stephen J. Rossiter and Chris G. Faulkes conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The research we did in this study involved observing, weighing and marking animals. These activities are all part of standard husbandry practice and are not regulated procedures covered by the 1986 Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act. All research was carried out in accordance with the institutional guidelines of Queen Mary, University of London.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data, code, and model output are available in the Supplemental Files.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Environmental Research Council (Grant NE/L002485/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

22 Citations 2,306 Views 441 Downloads