Investigating the potential impact of 1.5, 2 and 3 °C global warming levels on crop suitability and planting season over West Africa

View article
Environmental Science

Main article text

 

Introduction

Data and Methods

Study domain

Data

Historical and future climate datasets

Ecocrop dataset

Simulation approach

Assessing the robustness of climate change

Results

Simulated crop suitability in the historical climate over West Africa

Projected changes in crop suitability under different GWLs 1.5, 2.0. 3.0 over West Africa

Impact of different GWLs on crop planting period/month over West Africa suitability

Trends in projected change in crop suitability and month of planting under different warming levels

Discussion

Sensitivity of different crop types to different global warming levels in West Africa

Regional crop suitability, changes in planting months, adaptation and socio-economy in West Africa

Summary and Conclusion

  • A low or no suitability to the north and high suitability to the south, separated marginal suitability line over West Africa in the historical climate for all the six crops, in general, marginal suitability lines are observed around 14°N for all the crops across the region except for plantain. Plantain has its marginal suitability line south of 12°N.

  • At GWL1.5, there is a broadly similar spatial pattern of variation in suitability as the historical climate. However, a suitability shift (both spatial expansion and contraction simultaneously) is projected under 1.5 °C warming for cereals, legumes, groundnut along the central southern Sahel (around l13–14°N) and in the Guinea-Savanna zones for root and tuber, plantain.

  • Projected changes in crop suitability and suitable areas under the GWL1.5 °C shows all the crops remain suitable across the three AEZs of West Africa, although with reduction in the SIV of some crops like cassava and the cereals.

  • with GWL2.0 °C, the impact is more drastic on cereals and root and tubers with decrease in SIV of crops and a reduction in the suitability of some areas but are still suitable compared to legumes which have a relatively no change.

  • The impact of GWL3.0 °C leads to a more devastating effect such as a high decrease in the crop SIV resulting in more suitable areas becoming less suitable and unsuitable for cultivation notably south of the region. In contrast, warming under GWL3.0 leads to a northern extension of suitable area in growing cereals and legumes in the central area of the southern Sahel. However, the suitable areas lost are far more than those gained with the increasing warming.

  • the projected impact of GWL3.0 °C in comparison to GWL1.5 °C are most drastic on cereals and root and tuber crops with cassava the most impacted crop. The increase in warming, results in the loss of suitable areas in the southern Savanna and northern Sahel zone of the region become unsuitable for cassava in the south coast of Nigeria in the Guinea zone become marginally suitable for pearl millet and very high reduction, up to 0.3 in SIV for other crops. This further emphasizes the need for commitment to the Paris Accord by member country, and the benefit of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C that provides a suitable and favourable condition for cultivation and growth of the crops over West Africa.

  • The projected changes in crop suitability under GWL2.0 °C are less than at GWL3.0 °C. The change shows that an additional 1.0 °C beyond GWL2.0 °C results in a decrease in SIV of the crop with drastic impact on the suitable area in the past climate leading to reduction in suitability of cultivated areas south of 14°N over West Africa This benefit in keeping global warming well below 2 °C compared to GWL3.0 °C cannot be overemphasized with the fast-growing population and food demand over West Africa.

  • The impacts of the three GWLs for the planting month varies for the different crop types but is more pronounced on root and tuber and cereal crops especially cassava and maize respectively. In general, projected delay in PM from one to over 4 months may be experienced over the region across the three AEZs under the three GWLs for legumes, pearl millet and plantain.

  • The projected change for cassava and maize show delays in PM are expected in the south notably over the Guinea and central Savanna zone and early planting in the north in the Savanna-Sahel AEZs.

  • There is an increasing trend in the projected crop suitability change with increasing warming over the region and across the three warming for all the crops except cowpea and for groundnut between GWL1.5 and GWL2.0 °C.No change in trend value was observed for the planting for all the crops and across the three warming levels.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Jeff Price is an Academic Editor for PeerJ. The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Temitope Samuel Egbebiyi conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Olivier Crespo, Christopher Lennard, Jeff Price and Rachel Warren conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Modathir Zaroug, Grigory Nikulin and Nicole Forstenhäusler conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Ian Harris conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, provided CRU historical dataset, and approved the final draft.

Funding

This research was supported by funding from the National Research Foundation (NRF, South Africa). the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change and Climatic Research Unit (CRU) under the Newton PhD Partnering Scheme funded by Research Councils United Kingdom (RCUK), the Alliance Centre for Climate and Earth Systems Science (ACCESS, South Africa), the African Climate and Development Initiative (ACDI), the JW Jagger Centenary Scholarship and the Siri Johnson scholarship, University of Cape Town, South Africa. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

11 Citations 4,405 Views 592 Downloads

Your institution may have Open Access funds available for qualifying authors. See if you qualify

Publish for free

Comment on Articles or Preprints and we'll waive your author fee
Learn more

Five new journals in Chemistry

Free to publish • Peer-reviewed • From PeerJ
Find out more