Responses of fungal communities at different soil depths to grazing intensity in a desert steppe

View article
Ecology

Main article text

 

Introduction

Materials & Methods

Experimental area

Experimental design

Sample collection and index determination

Index determination of soil physical and chemical properties

DNA extraction and sequencing of soil fungi

Data analysis

Results

Soil characteristics

Fungal α-diversity

Fungal β-diversity

The linkage between soil characteristics and fungal communities

Discussion

Impact of grazing on soil physiochemical properties

Impact of grazing and soil depth on fungi

Regulating effects of soil properties on the response of fungi to grazing intensity

Conclusions

Supplemental Information

Soil physicochemistry

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18791/supp-2

Correlation analysis of environmental factors and soil fungal α-diversity index

Spearman’s correlation analysis between soil physicochemical properties and fungal α diversity at two soil depths; red represents positive correlation and blue represents negative correlation. *Significant at the 0.05 probability level. **Significant at the 0.01 probability level. ***Significant at the 0.001 probability level.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18791/supp-3

The responses of fungal genera relative abundance to different grazing intensities at two soil depths

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18791/supp-4

Above-ground biomass (Agb), plant litter and coverage under different grazing intensities

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18791/supp-5

Relative abundance of fungal phyla at two soil depths

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18791/supp-6

Relative abundance of dominant fungal phylum at different grazing intensities

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18791/supp-7

α diversity indices

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18791/supp-8

A two-way ANOVA of α diversity indices

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18791/supp-9

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Xiangjian Tu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Paul C. Struik analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Shixian Sun performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Zhang Wenbo performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Yong Zhang performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Ke Jin conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Zhen Wang conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The sequences are available at GenBank: NG_070110.1 and NR_171887.1.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplementary Files.

Funding

The study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071861, 42077054). The study was also supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFD1900300), and the National Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (2022LHMS03004, 2022MS03071). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

MIT

Your institution may have Open Access funds available for qualifying authors. See if you qualify

Publish for free

Comment on Articles or Preprints and we'll waive your author fee
Learn more

Five new journals in Chemistry

Free to publish • Peer-reviewed • From PeerJ
Find out more