Development and validation of lumbar spine finite element model

View article
Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

Main article text

 

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Intervertebral discs

Ligaments

Vertebrae

Boundary conditions and validation tests

Statistic metrics

Results

Range of motion in quasi-static tests

Range of motion in combined loading modes

Intradiscal pressures in compression

Range of motion in dynamic tests

Statistic analysis

Discussion

  • The 50th percentile of the AM THUMS v6.1 model was used in the analysis. Considering the biological biodiversity of the human population, the model yields results that properly describe the behavior of average male subjects. The current model can be used to investigate the biomechanics of a specific population. However, sensitivity analysis could provide importance for the development of numerical studies on the response of the lumbar spine section. It would show what structures, geometries, or material descriptions play a crucial role in the transmission of loads to the lumbar section.

  • The presented validation was performed on the basis of the experimental data selected by the authors. However, more experimental data are available in the literature (Guan et al., 2007; Niosi et al., 2008; Pearcy, 1985; Yamamoto et al., 1989) that can be used in validation. The authors selected experimental studies conducted for a male subject due to the tested male model of the lumbar spine. However, due to the biodiversity of the population, it would be necessary to verify and validate the obtained data with other experimental works.

  • A comprehensive analysis of the range of motion of the model in the sub-injurious range is an important first step in the validation of the model that may be used in crash analysis. However, it would be necessary to examine the model in conditions similar to those of a road accident, namely high strain rates, compression force, and moments (Minster, Lafon & Beillas, 2023; Yoganandan et al., 2023; Tushak et al., 2022; Tushak et al., 2023). The current validation set is not sufficient to fully evaluate the model’s ability to accurately predict the outcomes of a car crash.

Conclusions

Additional Information and Declaration

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Tomasz Wiczenbach conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Lukasz Pachocki conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Karol Daszkiewicz analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Piotr Łuczkiewicz analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Wojciech Witkowski analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The data is available at Most Wiedzy: Wiczenbach, T., Pachocki, Łukasz, Daszkiewicz, K., Łuczkiewicz, P., & Witkowski, W. (2023). Validation of lumbar spine finite element model [Data set]. Gdańsk University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.34808/4n5h-3949.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Centre of Poland under grant no. 2020/37/B/ST8/03231. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

7 Citations 1,957 Views 163 Downloads

Your institution may have Open Access funds available for qualifying authors. See if you qualify

Publish for free

Comment on Articles or Preprints and we'll waive your author fee
Learn more

Five new journals in Chemistry

Free to publish • Peer-reviewed • From PeerJ
Find out more