Differences in subjective well-being between individuals with distinct Joint Personality (temperament-character) networks in a Bulgarian sample

View article
Brain, Cognition and Mental Health

Main article text

 

Introduction

Method

Ethical statement

Participants

Measures

Personality

Subjective well-being

Statistical procedure

Results

Phase 1: Correlations between personality traits and subjective well-being

Phase 2: Prevalence of temperament profiles and character profiles and differences in subjective well-being

Phase 3: Joint personality (temperament-character) networks

Differences in temperament and character dimensions within individuals with distinct joint personality (temperament-character) networks

Differences in temperament and character dimensions between individuals with distinct joint personality (temperament-character) networks

Differences in subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction) within individuals with distinct joint personality (temperament-character) networks

Differences in subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction) between individuals with distinct joint personality (temperament-character) networks

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusions

Supplemental Information

Bulgarian Personality

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13956/supp-1

Supplemental Material

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13956/supp-2

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Danilo Garcia analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Maryam Kazemitabar analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Kristina Stoyanova analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Drozdstoy Stoyanov conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

C. Robert Cloninger conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

National Ethics Committee of the Bulgarian Association of Health Care Professionals.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data, all scales that are the subject of the performed analyzes, is available in the Supplemental File.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.

16 Citations 1,524 Views 113 Downloads

Your institution may have Open Access funds available for qualifying authors. See if you qualify

Publish for free

Comment on Articles or Preprints and we'll waive your author fee
Learn more

Five new journals in Chemistry

Free to publish • Peer-reviewed • From PeerJ
Find out more