0

Hi. The authors are stating that Acer, Quercus, Acacia and even Eucalyptus (basically their research topic) are coniferous trees. Obviously they are not, and I find it quite concerning that this passed 3 reviewers + 1 editor.

Also, some references from the same paragraph are wrongly cited (ex: Duperat et al. 2021 concerns Balsam fir trees and not Acer pseudoplatanus).

read more, vote or answer

waiting for moderation
Ask a question about this section

Comparative transcriptomics analysis of contrasting varieties of Eucalyptus camaldulensis reveals wind resistance genes

View article
Plant Biology

Main article text

 

Introduction

At present, research regarding wind resistance of trees has been mainly focused on coniferous species such as Acer pseudoplatanus (Zubizarreta-Gerendiain, Pukkala & Peltola, 2016; Duperat, Gardiner & Ruel, 2021), Quercus robur (Jackson et al., 2019), Maritime Pine (Dupont et al., 2018), Rubber (Edzang et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2012), Eucalyptus (Zanuncio et al., 2017; Zanuncio et al., 2019; Shang et al., 2017), and coastal protective tree species such as Casuarina equisetifolia and Acacia (Xu et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2010). Of these, Eucalyptus is an important plantation tree species with high economic benefits in China. The planting area of Eucalyptus in China has reached 5.46 million hm2 with an annual output of more than 45 million m3 of wood, making an important contribution to wood production (Arnold et al., 2013; Xie et al., 2017). Research on wind resistance of Eucalyptus has been mainly focused on their growth and wood properties after typhoons. For example, Zanuncio et al. (2017) measured the wood properties of E. grandis × E. urophylla to evaluate the resistance of Eucalyptus clones to wind damage. Luo et al. (2009) studied the genetic variation in growth and wind resistance of 2-year-old Eucalyptus hybrids. Shang et al. (2017) studied the effects on growth and wood properties with respect to wind resistance in 50 E. camaldulensis individuals. The results indicated that the wind damage index heritability was high and close to the heritability of fibre length. The heritability of individual trees and families was 0.516 and 0.524, respectively (Shang et al., 2017). Some studies based on field investigation and statistics were conducted in controlled conditions to evaluate the relationship between the wind damage index and individual tree traits to determine the factors influencing tree resistance to wind. However, resistance against winds in standing trees in fields can be attributed to many factors. Therefore, by exclusively using the conventional method including regression analysis of wind damage and tree traits, it is impossible to understand the key factors of wind resistance in trees and to elucidate the underlying mechanism. Abundant genetic resources with respect to wind resistance in Eucalyptus species are available (Luo et al., 2009; Shang et al., 2017), and it is important and urgent to utilize their wind resistance genes and develop new breeding-based varieties.

Materials & Methods

Plant material

Determination of wood traits

Total RNA extraction and cDNA library construction

Transcriptome sequencing and functional annotation

Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mining

Analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) verification

Results

Differential analysis of wood quality index between C037 and CA5

RNA sequencing data quality assessment

SNP detection

GO classification of genes where SNP loci reside

KEGG pathway analysis of SNP locus gene

Screening for DEGs

GO enrichment analysis

KEGG-based pathways enrichment analysis of the related genes

Differential expression analysis of cellulose synthesis genes

Differential expression analysis of lignin synthesis Genes

TFs related to wind stress

Verification of sequencing results by qRT-PCR analysis

Discussion

SNP sites based on RNA-sep

Relationship between cellulose anabolism and wind stress

Relationship between lignin anabolism and wind resistance

The relationship between TFs and wind resistance

Conclusions

Supplemental Information

Primers used in this study and amplification products

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-1

Reaction system of qRT-PCR

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-2

Sequencing data quality statistics

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-3

The number of annotated genes identified in searches of eight databases

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-4

Statistics of SNP in C037 and CA5

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-5

Annotated DEGs of different groups

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-6

Specific genes in CA5

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-7

The numbers of DEGs in different KEGG pathways

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-8

Gene expression trends in the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway (ko00940) based on KEGG(C037_0 h vs CA5_0h)

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-9

Volcano plots representing differentially expressed genes

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-10

Expression levels of differentially expressed transcription factors

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12954/supp-11

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Xiuhua Shang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Peijian Zhang performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Guo Liu and Ni Zhan analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Zhihua Wu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The RNA-Seq reads are available at Sequence Read Archive (SRA): SRP326456.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The RNA-Seq reads are available at Sequence Read Archive (SRA): SRP326456.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Non-profit Research Institution of Chinese Academy of Forestry (No. CAFYBB2019MA006). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

4 Citations 1,628 Views 136 Downloads

Your institution may have Open Access funds available for qualifying authors. See if you qualify

Publish for free

Comment on Articles or Preprints and we'll waive your author fee
Learn more

Five new journals in Chemistry

Free to publish • Peer-reviewed • From PeerJ
Find out more