NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.
Highlighted in The Human Motion Project

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Martin Daumer is an Academic Editor for PeerJ. None of the authors has competing interests.

Author Contributions

Martin Daumer conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Paul Subkowski performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Michael Trost performed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Christoph Stolle analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Christine Kleinmond wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Matthias Fasching analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Markus Walther conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Christian Lederer conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The studies concerning relay runners resp. 24 ultra-marathon have been accepted by the local ethics committee (sessions 11/2012 resp. 06/2014). All participants gave their written informed consent and were instructed to apply their normal running style.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?

key=0AvgupxDHApmCdGppOFdsbEotTDMzQWtpWUdGWW9WTlE&usp=drive_web#g

id=0

Funding

This study was partially supported by the EU (FP7 Easy IMP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads