Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

List of species included in the analyses

A table containing the list of species used in the comparisons, including scientific name, taxonomic ID, primary source, and version number.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.421v1/supp-1

Detailed comparisons with kClust and UCLUST

Detailed comparisons with kClust and UCLUST in terms of recall and runtime, for several sets of input parameters.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.421v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

CD is an Academic Editor for PeerJ and co-organises the GNOME 2014 symposium for which this submission is a contribution.

Author Contributions

Lucas D Wittwer performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ivana Piližota performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Adrian M Altenhoff analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Christophe Dessimoz conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

AMA is funded by a Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Infrastructure Grant. IP is jointly funded by a UCL Impact Award and by Bayer CropScience. Open access publication charges are covered by the University College London Library. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies