Visitors   Views   Downloads

The impact of floating dust on net photosynthetic rate of Populus euphratica in early spring, at Zepu, northwestern China

View preprint
342 days ago
The impact of floating dust on net photosynthetic rate of Populus euphratica in early spring, at Zepu, northwestern China https://t.co/POms1UeTx6
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Photosynthetic response raw data

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3452v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Zhiguo XUE conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Zhenxing SHEN conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Wei HAN conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Shanyang XU performed the experiments.

Xiaohua MA performed the experiments, analyzed the data.

Bingqiang FEI performed the experiments.

Tian ZHANG performed the experiments.

Tian CHANG performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Field experiments were approved by Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(Grant Nos. 201442137-11). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies