Visitors   Views   Downloads

Are extinction opinions extinct?

View preprint
147 days ago
Are extinction opinions extinct? https://t.co/P55hb2oTxi
RT @PLOSPaleo: Are extinction opinions extinct? https://t.co/fYzbdK58Bz via @PeerJPreprints
RT @PLOSPaleo: Are extinction opinions extinct? https://t.co/fYzbdK58Bz via @PeerJPreprints
RT @PLOSPaleo: Are extinction opinions extinct? https://t.co/fYzbdK58Bz via @PeerJPreprints
Are extinction opinions extinct? https://t.co/fYzbdK58Bz via @PeerJPreprints
150 days ago
Are extinction opinions extinct? https://t.co/23Oo6CAgHs
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Random values drawn from the distributions for quality of each individual sighting

Each column represents a sighting.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3095v1/supp-1

R code used to implement the model

Uses Jags.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3095v1/supp-2

R code used to implement the model

Uses Jags.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3095v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

David L Roberts is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Tamsin E Lee conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Clive Bowman conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David L Roberts wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data and code have been provided as supplemental files.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies