Visitors   Views   Downloads

Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review

View preprint
RT @OSCCI_OXFORD: First paper on the @ERC_Research funded CANDICE project has been accepted at PeerJ- see the preprint here: https://t.co/B…
RT @OSCCI_OXFORD: First paper on the @ERC_Research funded CANDICE project has been accepted at PeerJ- see the preprint here: https://t.co/B…
RT @OSCCI_OXFORD: First paper on the @ERC_Research funded CANDICE project has been accepted at PeerJ- see the preprint here: https://t.co/B…
RT @OSCCI_OXFORD: First paper on the @ERC_Research funded CANDICE project has been accepted at PeerJ- see the preprint here: https://t.co/B…
171 days ago
First paper on the @ERC_Research funded CANDICE project has been accepted at PeerJ- see the preprint here: https://t.co/BwJTDoZ2it
Preprint: Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review https://t.co/RlIloZgL8b https://t.co/wRIbmep4vM
RT @ZWoodhead: Very excited to have a preprint out in @PeerJPreprints! Review of laterality index methods in fMRI https://t.co/rtrY2FbZVs @…
RT @ZWoodhead: Very excited to have a preprint out in @PeerJPreprints! Review of laterality index methods in fMRI https://t.co/rtrY2FbZVs @…
Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review https://t.co/T0Rp6O50g8
RT @ZWoodhead: Very excited to have a preprint out in @PeerJPreprints! Review of laterality index methods in fMRI https://t.co/rtrY2FbZVs @…
RT @ZWoodhead: Very excited to have a preprint out in @PeerJPreprints! Review of laterality index methods in fMRI https://t.co/rtrY2FbZVs @…
RT @ZWoodhead: Very excited to have a preprint out in @PeerJPreprints! Review of laterality index methods in fMRI https://t.co/rtrY2FbZVs @…
RT @deevybee: Review of fMRI method for cerebral lateralisation: 1st paper from @ERC_Research funded project -preprint just up https://t.co…
220 days ago
RT @deevybee: Review of fMRI method for cerebral lateralisation: 1st paper from @ERC_Research funded project -preprint just up https://t.co…
RT @deevybee: Review of fMRI method for cerebral lateralisation: 1st paper from @ERC_Research funded project -preprint just up https://t.co…
RT @ZWoodhead: Very excited to have a preprint out in @PeerJPreprints! Review of laterality index methods in fMRI https://t.co/rtrY2FbZVs @…
RT @ZWoodhead: Very excited to have a preprint out in @PeerJPreprints! Review of laterality index methods in fMRI https://t.co/rtrY2FbZVs @…
220 days ago
RT @ZWoodhead: Very excited to have a preprint out in @PeerJPreprints! Review of laterality index methods in fMRI https://t.co/rtrY2FbZVs @…
Very excited to have a preprint out in @PeerJPreprints! Review of laterality index methods in fMRI https://t.co/rtrY2FbZVs @OSCCI_OXFORD
RT @deevybee: Review of fMRI method for cerebral lateralisation: 1st paper from @ERC_Research funded project -preprint just up https://t.co…
RT @deevybee: Review of fMRI method for cerebral lateralisation: 1st paper from @ERC_Research funded project -preprint just up https://t.co…
RT @deevybee: Review of fMRI method for cerebral lateralisation: 1st paper from @ERC_Research funded project -preprint just up https://t.co…
RT @deevybee: Review of fMRI method for cerebral lateralisation: 1st paper from @ERC_Research funded project -preprint just up https://t.co…
RT @deevybee: Review of fMRI method for cerebral lateralisation: 1st paper from @ERC_Research funded project -preprint just up https://t.co…
RT @deevybee: Review of fMRI method for cerebral lateralisation: 1st paper from @ERC_Research funded project -preprint just up https://t.co…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

List of 76 selected studies

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2962v2/supp-2

Database of data inputted from 76 selected studies

Spreadsheet drawn from REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) database used to input data on each of the 76 selected studies.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2962v2/supp-3

Table S3: Summary of 76 studies included in systematic review

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2962v2/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Dorothy Bishop is an Academic Editor and Academic Advisor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Abigail R. Bradshaw performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Dorothy V. M. Bishop conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Zoe V. J. Woodhead prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Figures created by the authors for this review have been published on figshare within a project named 'Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review'. This can be found at https://figshare.com/projects/Methodological_considerations_in_assessment_of_language_lateralisation_with_fMRI_a_systematic_review/20903

Code used to create some of these figures will be posted on GitHub, and can be found at: https://github.com/p1981thompson/Candice

Funding

This work was supported by an Advanced Grant awarded by the European Research Council (project 694189 - Cerebral Asymmetry: New directions in Correlates and Etiology – CANDICE). Dorothy Bishop is funded by programme grant 082498/Z/07/Z from the Wellcome Trust. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies