NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.
A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version
  1. September 14, 2018: [Withdrawal Notice:]

    The University of Tulsa Research Misconduct Investigating Committee has found that Dr. Gad improperly submitted the manuscript “Bacteria from hypersaline environments: a bioactivity reservoir of anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus” (Gad, 2017)[1] to PeerJ Preprints. Dr Gad assigned himself as sole author. However, based on the evidence acquired by the committee, the committee found that Dr Fakhr (PhD Research Advisor of Dr. Gad) made significant contributions to the research that warrant co-authorship; in fact senior authorship. Furthermore, Dr Fakhr did not approve the final version on the manuscript. Therefore at the request of The University of Tulsa Research Misconduct Investigating Committee this preprint is Withdrawn from publication.

    [1] Gad AH. 2017. Bacteria from hypersaline environments: a bioactivity reservoir of anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PeerJ Preprints 5:e2910v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2910v1

Supplemental Information

Raw Data, Tables and Figures

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2910v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Ahmed H. Gad conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs (The Student Research Grant Program) of The University of Tulsa, USA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads