Visitors   Views   Downloads

Missing, delayed, and old: A status review of ESA recovery plans

View preprint
151 days ago
Missing, delayed, and old: A status review of ESA recovery plans https://t.co/b5W0JeVcbJ
151 days ago
Our preprint revision is up at @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/8yQ7khSZN2 #Biodiversity #ConservationBiology #SciencePolicy
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Section 7 consultation with recovery units

A section 7 consultation document (biological opinion) that uses recovery units, which are defined in the species' recovery plan.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2882v2/supp-1

A PowerPoint presentation of the US Fish and WIldlife Service's Recovery Enhancement Vision

A PowerPoint presentation of the US Fish and WIldlife Service's Recovery Enhancement Vision.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2882v2/supp-2

An information sheet on of the US Fish and WIldlife Service's Recovery Planning and Implementation updates (formerly Recovery Enhancement Vision)

An information sheet on of the US Fish and WIldlife Service's Recovery Planning and Implementation updates (formerly Recovery Enhancement Vision).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2882v2/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jacob Malcom conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ya-Wei Li performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Open Science Framework, osf.io

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZWHV3 (project overall)

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/V73C8 (code component)

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H4TYH (data component)

URL: https://osf.io/zwhv3/

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies