NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.
A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Cole S Bailey conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Hans J Moldenhauer performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Su Mi Park performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Sotirios Keros analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Andrea L Meredith conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

No raw data is contained in this review.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from NHLBI R01-HL102758 (A.L.M.), the Training Program in Integrative Membrane Biology NHLBI T32-GM008181 (A.L.M.), The American Physiological Society’s Ryuji Ueno award, sponsored by the S & R Foundation (A.L.M.), and a University of Maryland School of Medicine Proposed Research Initiated by Students and Mentors (PRISM) Program Merit Award (C.S.B.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads