NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Zuzana Majtánová conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Karl G Moy conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Peter J Unmack contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Petr Ráb analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Tariq Ezaz contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

University of Canberra ethics committee provided full approval for this research (CEAE.15-05).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

All data collected is provided within this publication.

Funding

This study was supported by the project No. MSM200451701 from the Czech Academy of Sciences (ZM), project EXCELLENCE CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000460 OP RDE (PR, ZM) and the project No. 18-09323S from the Czech Science Foundation (PR, ZM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads