Visitors   Views   Downloads

How systematic reviews cover practitioners' issues: A study on Stack Exchange communities

View preprint
RT @brunocartaxo: [QUICK FIX] HOW SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (SRs) COVER PRACTITIONERS ISSUES IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING? https://t.co/rgacxlsW5o
[QUICK FIX] HOW SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (SRs) COVER PRACTITIONERS ISSUES IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING? https://t.co/rgacxlsW5o
QUICK FIX https://t.co/rgacxlsW5o that's the working url to access the paper
How systematic reviews cover practitioners' issues: A study on Stack Exchange communities pre-printer available at https://t.co/AfXoW577Za
My preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/vtwLH4yVsn #SoftwareEngineering
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Coverage Analysis Procedure

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27610v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Bruno Cartaxo conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Gustavo Pinto conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Fernando Kamei performed the experiments, analyzed the data.

Danilo Monteiro performed the experiments, analyzed the data.

Fabio Queda authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sergio Soares authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

http://bit.ly/2lONdj2

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies