Ten myths around open scholarly publishing

View preprint
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @mtenaespinoza: #LecturaObligada Ten open scholarly publishing myths
reply repost on X like
#LecturaObligada Ten open scholarly publishing myths
reply repost on X like
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @mdelhaye: 10 mythes sur la science ouverte https://t.co/gXKegIumJB
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
"By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that studies published in peer-reviewedjournals are 'true' and that peer review protects the literature from flawed science." https://t.co/75jVo553FW
reply repost on X like
2505 days ago
RT @mdelhaye: 10 mythes sur la science ouverte https://t.co/gXKegIumJB
reply repost on X like
RT @mdelhaye: 10 mythes sur la science ouverte https://t.co/gXKegIumJB
reply repost on X like
10 mythes sur la science ouverte https://t.co/gXKegIumJB
reply repost on X like
Ten open scholarly publishing myths https://t.co/p3ykPqLKLN via @PeerJPreprints
reply repost on X like
Great paper about the myths of open scholarly publishing. Well worth a read and a share! https://t.co/2FA3HyMXoE
reply repost on X like
Great paper about the myths of open scholarly publishing. Well worth a read and a share! https://t.co/foyxAqE87h
reply repost on X like
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
reply repost on X like