Ten myths around open scholarly publishing
Liudmyla Ostapenko @liu_ost
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
repost on X
jean-philippe accart @jpaccart
2505 days ago
RT @mdelhaye: 10 mythes sur la science ouverte https://t.co/gXKegIumJB
@[email protected] @Vaguery
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Snehal Shekatkar @ShekatkarSnehal
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Kiwa @equihua_sm
2505 days ago
RT @mtenaespinoza: #LecturaObligada
Ten open scholarly publishing myths
IuliaLathebiosas @Lutraepicurea
2505 days ago
RT @mdelhaye: 10 mythes sur la science ouverte https://t.co/gXKegIumJB
Rene Bekkers @renebekkers
2505 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
Anita Beldiman-Moore @AtinaBM
2505 days ago
RT @mdelhaye: 10 mythes sur la science ouverte https://t.co/gXKegIumJB
Odile Contat @ocontat
2505 days ago
RT @mdelhaye: 10 mythes sur la science ouverte https://t.co/gXKegIumJB
Frank Miedema @MiedemaF
2505 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
Nader Ale Ebrahim @aleebrahim
2505 days ago
Ten open scholarly publishing myths https://t.co/hbFzHTcEHj via @PeerJPreprints
Sylvain Chabé-Ferret @SylvainCF
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Oliver Lopez-Corona @otrasenda_AC
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Pavel_Prosselkov @PavelProsselkov
2505 days ago
10 Sins of the publishing world https://t.co/DW3yE2UxSP via @PeerJPreprints
Ramesh Kr Sah @rameshkrshah
2505 days ago
RT @MMU_LRS: Interesting paper on the ten myths around open scholarly publishing. It's open for comment at
https://t.co/Vl8kerspXk https://…
Vanessa E Greenwood @VanessaEGreenwd
2505 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Bébio Vieira Amaro @bebio_amaro
2505 days ago
An interesting pre-print, non-peer reviewed article about open-access publishing. https://t.co/E7uBDa3TZJ
Melissa Rethlefsen @mlrethlefsen
2506 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Lonni Besançon @lonnibesancon
2506 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Andy Thorburn @thorbrew
2506 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Jon Tennant @Protohedgehog
2506 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Jonathan Jarry @crackedscience
2506 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Paola Masuzzo @pcmasuzzo
2506 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
Paola Masuzzo @pcmasuzzo
2506 days ago
RT @mtenaespinoza: #LecturaObligada
Ten open scholarly publishing myths
Lupicinio Iñiguez-Rueda @lupicinio
2506 days ago
RT @mtenaespinoza: #LecturaObligada
Ten open scholarly publishing myths