Visitors   Views   Downloads

Ten myths around open scholarly publishing

View preprint
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
RT @NAERJournal: https://t.co/qkzSuoGi8d
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @NAERJournal: https://t.co/qkzSuoGi8d
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @NAERJournal: https://t.co/qkzSuoGi8d
RT @NAERJournal: https://t.co/qkzSuoGi8d
RT @NAERJournal: https://t.co/qkzSuoGi8d
https://t.co/qkzSuoGi8d
RT @TuSocialMedia: 10 mitos sobre las publicaciones académicas en
RT @TuSocialMedia: 10 mitos sobre las publicaciones académicas en
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
1 day ago
[tag] Ten myths around open scholarly publishing [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/ASWYpQkjNT
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
1 day ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @ceciroz: Muy interesante preprint Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. PeerJ Preprints 7:e27580v1 https://t.co/8NlbERI3yI Especi…
RT @ceciroz: Muy interesante preprint Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. PeerJ Preprints 7:e27580v1 https://t.co/8NlbERI3yI Especi…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 10: Publishers add no value to the scholarly communication process https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 9: Web of Science and Scopus are global databases of knowledge https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Andy Nobes is employed by International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications. Bárbara R López is employed by Asesora Producción Científica. Tony Ross-Hellauer is employed by Know-Center GmbH. Jonathan Tennant, Johanna Havemann, and Paola Masuzzo are independent researchers with IGDORE.

Author Contributions

Jonathan P Tennant authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Harry Crane authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Tom Crick authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jacinto Davila authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Asura Enkhbayar authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Johanna Havemann authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Bianca Kramer authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Ryan Martin authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Paola Masuzzo authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Andy Nobes authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Curt Rice authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Bárbara R López authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Tony Ross-Hellauer authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Susanne Sattler authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Paul Thacker authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Marc Vanholsbeeck authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

There are no raw data or code for this article.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies