Ten myths around open scholarly publishing

View preprint
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
2503 days ago
@OBi_Ojemany Agreed! Curious to know more about why don't you think they are as relevant as advertised. Did you see what we wrote recently about this? see myth #9 here https://t.co/2la8Ki4U2A Would be interested in your feedback
reply repost on X like
RT @mdelhaye: 10 mythes sur la science ouverte https://t.co/gXKegIumJB
reply repost on X like
RT @mdelhaye: 10 mythes sur la science ouverte https://t.co/gXKegIumJB
reply repost on X like
2503 days ago
RT @mtenaespinoza: #LecturaObligada Ten open scholarly publishing myths
reply repost on X like
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
reply repost on X like
RT @mtenaespinoza: #LecturaObligada Ten open scholarly publishing myths
reply repost on X like
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
reply repost on X like
2503 days ago
RT @mtenaespinoza: #LecturaObligada Ten open scholarly publishing myths
reply repost on X like
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
reply repost on X like
RT @mtenaespinoza: #LecturaObligada Ten open scholarly publishing myths
reply repost on X like
2503 days ago
Neither WOS & Scopus representthe sum of current global research knowledge includingAfrica, Latin America and SE Asia. PeerJ Preprints 7:e27580v1 https://t.co/UYd5913lK7 @MilosVojar @tamsin_vicary @piaulia @mariakalen2 @IAMSLIC2016 @shahhaykal #FAOASFA https://t.co/bZgyZVD6R0
reply repost on X like
2503 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
2503 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @mtenaespinoza: #LecturaObligada Ten open scholarly publishing myths
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
2503 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
2503 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
2503 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like
RT @RetractionWatch: "By failing to effectively communicate that peer review is imperfect, the message conveyed to the wider public is that…
reply repost on X like