NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplementary Tables with STACKS data processing information

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27546v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Luke C Campillo conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Joseph D. Manthey conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Robert C. Thomson analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft.

Peter A. Hosner conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Robert G. Moyle conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

Raw RADSeq data files (.fastq format) have been uploaded to NCBI SRA, and are associated with BioProjectID: PRJNA522809.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA522809

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

1) NCBI SRA

2) BioProjectID: PRJNA522809

3) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/522809

Funding

The National Science Foundation (DEB-0743491; DEB-1418895), American Ornithologists’ Society, American Museum of Natural History Chapman Fund, and the University of Kansas Panorama Fund supported fieldwork; The National Science Foundation (DEB-1110619; DEB-1557053) and the University of Kansas Graduate Student Research Fund supported lab work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads