NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

A list of metagenome assemblies used to evaluate binning performance

IMG access IDs and Sample names for IMG-100 dataset

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27522v1/supp-1

List of parameter sets to evaluate MetaBAT2 on 120 real metagenome assemblies

The parameter sets and their performance comparison to the default parameter set.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27522v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Dongwan Kang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Feng Li performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Edward S Kirton performed the experiments, analyzed the data, approved the final draft.

Ashleigh Thomas performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Rob S Egan conceived and designed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Hong An authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Zhong Wang conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://bitbucket.org/berkeleylab/metabat

Funding

The work was conducted by the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute. Dongwan Kang, Edward Kirton, Ashleigh Thomas, Rob Egan, and Zhong Wang’s work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Feng Li was supported by an exchange student fellowship from China Scholarship Council (CSC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
17 Citations   Views   Downloads