Visitors   Views   Downloads

Resolving relationships in an exceedingly young orchid lineage using Genotyping-by-sequencing data

View preprint
RT @oapereze: Preprint in @PeerJPreprints hot off the press (hopefully soon out as peer-reviewed)! How useful is GBS data for phylogenomics…
RT @oapereze: Preprint in @PeerJPreprints hot off the press (hopefully soon out as peer-reviewed)! How useful is GBS data for phylogenomics…
RT @oapereze: Preprint in @PeerJPreprints hot off the press (hopefully soon out as peer-reviewed)! How useful is GBS data for phylogenomics…
RT @oapereze: Preprint in @PeerJPreprints hot off the press (hopefully soon out as peer-reviewed)! How useful is GBS data for phylogenomics…
RT @oapereze: Preprint in @PeerJPreprints hot off the press (hopefully soon out as peer-reviewed)! How useful is GBS data for phylogenomics…
23 days ago
PJpreprint: Resolving relationships in an exceedingly young orchid lineage using Genotyping-by-sequencing data https://t.co/5qpxL6IY1E
RT @oapereze: Preprint in @PeerJPreprints hot off the press (hopefully soon out as peer-reviewed)! How useful is GBS data for phylogenomics…
RT @oapereze: Preprint in @PeerJPreprints hot off the press (hopefully soon out as peer-reviewed)! How useful is GBS data for phylogenomics…
RT @oapereze: Preprint in @PeerJPreprints hot off the press (hopefully soon out as peer-reviewed)! How useful is GBS data for phylogenomics…
Preprint in @PeerJPreprints hot off the press (hopefully soon out as peer-reviewed)! How useful is GBS data for phylogenomics of very young neotropical orchid lineages? https://t.co/q7xayuddKl #Biodiversity #Orchids @DrSDodsworth @KewAmericas @antonelli_lab @GGBC_GU
Resolving relationships in an exceedingly young orchid lineage using Genotyping-by-sequencing data https://t.co/x7RjKwjfj9
24 days ago
Resolving relationships in an exceedingly young orchid lineage using Genotyping-by-sequencing data https://t.co/55nCgOjR9I
Resolving relationships in an exceedingly young orchid lineage using Genotyping-by-sequencing data https://t.co/k2ZMsXfQHr
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplementary figures S1-S8

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27296v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Oscar A Pérez Escobar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Diego Bogarín analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Rowan Schley contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Richard Bateman contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Guenter Gerlach conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Doerte Harpke performed the experiments, analyzed the data.

Jonathan Brassac performed the experiments, analyzed the data.

Mario Fernández-Mazuecos analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Steven Dodsworth analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Eric Hagsater contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Marc Gottschling conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Frank Blattner conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

G. Romero (AMES), the Lankester Botanic Garden (Cartago) and Comisión Institucional de Biodiversidad of the University of Costa Rica provided vegetal material and the permits for the access to the genetic information. Autoridad Nacional del Ambiente of Panama (ANAM) and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (Panama City), and Costa Rican Ministry of Environment (MINAET) provided scientific research permits (SE/AP-20-13 and FOI-004-001, respectively).

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

Raw sequence data will be released in SRA upon acceptance of the manuscript

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Loci alignments to be archived in Dryad upon acceptance of the manuscript

Funding

The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft provided financial support (grants BL 462/14-1, GE 828/12-1, GO 1459/8). MFM is supported by the Juan de la Cierva fellowship of the Spanish Ministry of Economy (IJCI-2015-23459). OAPE is supported by the Lady Sainsbury Orchid Fellowship at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies