NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Seán I O'Donoghue analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Benedetta F Baldi analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Susan J Clark prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Aaron E Darling analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

James M Hogan analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Sandeep Kaur analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables.

Lena Maier-Hein prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Davis J McCarthy analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

William J Moore analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables.

Esther Stenau analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables.

Jason R Swedlow prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jenny Vuong analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables.

James B Procter analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Code and data are not the primary focus of this review. Several of the authors employed scripts and public data to create visualisations but the figures in the manuscript are the product of manual adaptation to illustrate limitations of existing tools and need for more effective biological data visualisation systems (which is the topic of this review).

Funding

JB Procter was supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [grant number BB/L020742/1]. JR Swedlow and WJ Moore are supported by the Wellcome Trust [grant number 202908/Z/16/Z] and UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [grant number BB/P027032/1]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads