NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Data for each embryonated egg evaluated for each of the 7 replicates

Data for each embryonated egg evaluated for each of the 7 replicates for each day of the experiment. Metadata tab provides explaination for each column used in the dataset.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26750v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Kelsie L. Kelly conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Caz M. Taylor conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplementary File.

Funding

This research was made possible through funding from the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative (RFP II, PIs Neigel and Taylor) and a grant from Newcomb College Institute at Tulane University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads