2 Citations   Views   Downloads

Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices and experimental design for genomic studies

View preprint
RT @IndianaCristo: Matos-Maraví et al. 2019. Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choice…
Matos-Maraví et al. 2019. Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices and experimental design for genomic studies. https://t.co/QB0xktn9x2 https://t.co/leXGZZLhK9
Preprint: Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices and experimental design for genomic studies https://t.co/BmauwYcboG https://t.co/2YPSwkhutM
RT @iDigBio: Rule 9: Make your data and results publicly available Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on…
810 days ago
Rule 9: Make your data and results publicly available Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices . - https://t.co/WazapzQnEt
RT @antonelli_lab: Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/2fstix9gT0 #Biodiversity #Entomology #Evolutionary…
RT @antonelli_lab: Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/2fstix9gT0 #Biodiversity #Entomology #Evolutionary…
RT @antonelli_lab: Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/2fstix9gT0 #Biodiversity #Entomology #Evolutionary…
RT @antonelli_lab: Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/2fstix9gT0 #Biodiversity #Entomology #Evolutionary…
Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/2fstix9gT0 #Biodiversity #Entomology #EvolutionaryStudies #Genomics
811 days ago
Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices, common challenges, and experimental design for genomic studies https://t.co/pp7BzXF4om
811 days ago
PJpreprint: Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices, common challenges, and experimental design for genomic studies https://t.co/0pyxXd1kZs
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Raw data of publication records retrieved from Web of Science

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26661v3/supp-1

Curated data of publication records retrieved from Web of Science

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26661v3/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Pável Matos-Maraví conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Camila Duarte Ritter conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Christopher J Barnes prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Martin Nielsen prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Urban Olsson prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Niklas Wahlberg prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Daniel Marquina prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Ilari Sääksjärvi prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Alexandre Antonelli conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

We retrieved records from the Web of Science and present the raw data as Supplemental files

Funding

Funding to Pável Matos-Maraví was provided by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellowship (project MARIPOSAS-704035). Camila Duarte Ritter received the support from CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - Brazil). Christopher Barnes was funded by the Aage V. Jensen Naturfond of Denmark (1121721001). Daniel Marquina and Niklas Wahlberg received funding from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 642241 (BIG4 project). Niklas Wahlberg received funding from the Swedish Research Council. Alexandre Antonelli is supported by grant from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Research Council (B0569601), the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, the Faculty of Sciences at the University of Gothenburg, and the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies at Harvard University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies