Visitors   Views   Downloads

Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices, common challenges, and experimental design for genomic studies

View preprint
RT @iDigBio: Rule 9: Make your data and results publicly available Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on…
195 days ago
Rule 9: Make your data and results publicly available Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices . - https://t.co/WazapzQnEt
RT @antonelli_lab: Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/2fstix9gT0 #Biodiversity #Entomology #Evolutionary…
RT @antonelli_lab: Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/2fstix9gT0 #Biodiversity #Entomology #Evolutionary…
RT @antonelli_lab: Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/2fstix9gT0 #Biodiversity #Entomology #Evolutionary…
RT @antonelli_lab: Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/2fstix9gT0 #Biodiversity #Entomology #Evolutionary…
Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/2fstix9gT0 #Biodiversity #Entomology #EvolutionaryStudies #Genomics
196 days ago
Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices, common challenges, and experimental design for genomic studies https://t.co/pp7BzXF4om
196 days ago
PJpreprint: Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices, common challenges, and experimental design for genomic studies https://t.co/0pyxXd1kZs
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Pável Matos-Maraví conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Camila Duarte Ritter conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Christopher J Barnes prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Martin Nielsen prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Urban Olsson prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Niklas Wahlberg prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Daniel Marquina prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Ilari Sääksjärvi prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Alexandre Antonelli conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code because it is a Literature Review and Perspective paper.

Funding

Funding to PMM was provided by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellowship (project MARIPOSAS-704035). CDR received the support from CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - Brazil). CJB was funded by the Aage V. Jensen Naturfond of Denmark (1121721001). DM and NW received funding from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 642241 (BIG4 project). AA is supported by grant from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Research Council (B0569601), the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, the Faculty of Sciences at the University of Gothenburg, and the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies at Harvard University. NW received funding from the Swedish Research Council. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies