Multiple stressors threaten the imperiled coastal foundation species eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Chesapeake Bay, USA
Author and article information
Abstract
Interactions among global change stressors and their effects at large scales are often proposed, but seldom evaluated. This situation is primarily due to lack of comprehensive, sufficiently long-term, and spatially-extensive datasets. Seagrasses, which provide nursery habitat, improve water quality, and constitute a globally-important carbon sink, are among the most vulnerable habitats on the planet. Here, we unite 31-years of high-resolution aerial monitoring and water quality data to elucidate the patterns and drivers of eelgrass (Zostera marina) abundance in Chesapeake Bay, USA, one of the largest and most valuable estuaries in the world with an unparalleled history of regulatory efforts. We show that eelgrass area has declined 29% in total since 1991, with wide-ranging and severe ecological and economic consequences. We go on to identify an interaction between decreasing water clarity and warming temperatures as the primary driver of this trend. Declining clarity has gradually reduced eelgrass over the past two decades, primarily in deeper beds where light is already limiting. In shallow beds, however, reduced visibility exacerbates the physiological stress of acute warming, leading to recent instances of decline approaching 80%. While degraded water quality has long been known to influence underwater grasses worldwide, we demonstrate a clear and rapidly emerging interaction with climate change. We highlight the urgent need to integrate a broader perspective into local water quality management, in the Chesapeake Bay and in the many other coastal systems facing similar stressors.
Cite this as
2017. Multiple stressors threaten the imperiled coastal foundation species eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Chesapeake Bay, USA. PeerJ Preprints 5:e2544v2 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2544v2Author comment
This submission is in parallel to final revisions submitted to Global Change Biology.
Sections
Supplemental Information
Additional Information
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Jonathan S Lefcheck conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.
David J Wilcox conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Rebecca R Murphy performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Scott R Marion conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Robert J Orth conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Data Deposition
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data or code is included in the manuscript.
Funding
The US Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program, National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration Virginia Coastal Program, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and Maryland Department of Natural Resources for providing funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.