Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Brooke Maslo analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Thomas A Schlacher conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mike A. Weston conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Chantal M Huijbers wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Chris Anderson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments.

Ben L Gilby wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Andrew D Olds wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Rod M Connolly wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David S Schoeman analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All work was conducted under Animal Ethics Permit No. AN/A/14/84 issued by the University of the Sunshine Coast, and the Scientific Purposes Permits WITK14608214 and WISP14609114 issued by the Queensland Government Department of Environment and Heritage Protection.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file.

Funding

This study was supported by the Australian government's Collaborative Research Network (CRN). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies