Optimization of 16S amplicon analysis using mock communities: implications for estimating community diversity
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Biodiversity, Bioinformatics, Ecology, Microbiology
- Keywords
- QIIME, mock communities, amplicon, 16S, OTU, quality filtering, optimization, Illumina, sequencing error, microbial ecology
- Copyright
- © 2016 Krohn et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2016. Optimization of 16S amplicon analysis using mock communities: implications for estimating community diversity. PeerJ Preprints 4:e2196v3 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2196v3
Abstract
The diversity of complex microbial communities can be rapidly assessed by high-throughput DNA sequencing of marker gene (e.g., 16S) PCR amplicon pools, often yielding many thousands of DNA sequences per sample. However, analysis of such community amplicon sequencing data requires multiple computational steps which affect the outcome of a final data set. Here we use mock communities to describe the effects of parameter adjustments for raw sequence quality filtering, picking operational taxonomic units (OTUs), taxonomic assignment, and OTU table filtering as implemented in the popular microbial ecology analysis package, QIIME 1.9.1. We demonstrate a workflow optimization based upon this exploration, which we also apply to environmental samples. We found that quality filtering of raw data and filtering of OTU tables had large effects on observed OTU diversity. While all taxonomy assignment programs performed with similar accuracy, an appropriate choice of similarity threshold for defining OTUs depended on the method used for OTU picking. Our “default” analysis in QIIME overestimated mock community OTU diversity by at least a factor of ten. Our optimized analysis correctly characterized mock community taxonomic composition and improved the OTU diversity estimate, reducing overestimation to a factor of about two. Though observed relative abundances of mock community member taxa were approximately correct, most were still represented by multiple OTUs. Low-frequency OTUs conspecific to constituent mock community taxa were characterized by multiple substitution and indel errors and the presence of a low-quality base call resulting in sequence truncation during quality filtering. Low-quality base calls were observed at “G” positions most of the time, and were also associated with a preceding “TTT” trinucleotide motif. Environmental diversity estimates were reduced by about 40% from 2508 to 1533 OTUs when comparing output from the default and optimized workflows. We attribute this reduction in observed diversity to the removal of erroneous sequences from the data set. Our results indicate that both strict quality filtering of raw sequencing data and careful filtering of raw OTU tables are important steps for accurately estimating microbial community diversity.
Author Comment
Manuscript revisions for PeerJ review.