Mapping the functional connectivity of predation by large carnivores in the Canadian Rocky Mountains
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Animal Behavior, Biodiversity, Conservation Biology, Ecology, Zoology
- Keywords
- carnivore, corridor, human-wildlife conflict
- Copyright
- © 2016 Ford
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2016. Mapping the functional connectivity of predation by large carnivores in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. PeerJ Preprints 4:e2031v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2031v1
Abstract
After decades of persecution, large carnivores are returning to human-occupied landscapes in many areas of North America and Europe. To ensure the safety of both people and wildlife, we need to understand how these animals perceive and select habitat as they navigate through developed area. Here, I investigate habitat selection by wolves and cougars in a 20,000 km2 landscape characterized by a marked gradient of urban and industrial development. I used data from over 15,000 km of wolf and cougar movement pathways, and from over 750 kill sites made by these two predators. These data were collected during the past 22 winters in Banff National Park (Alberta, Canada) and environs. Using GIS software, I created habitat selection models by comparing ‘used’ resources (e.g., topography, habitat type) found along movement pathways and at kill sites, with random points located <500 m from used sites. I then incorporated the results of these habitat selection models into a connectivity analysis to quantify the predicted flow of both movement and predation across the landscape. These results illustrate the extent to which ‘connectivity’ depends on species (e.g., cougars vs. wolves), behavior (movement vs. foraging), and proximity to people. These results are being used to inform policy on land-use planning in areas where large carnivores and people co-exist.
Author Comment
This is an abstract which has been accepted for the "Predator-Prey Dynamics" conference.